MTN: Court rejects AGF preliminary objection
The Federal High Court recently delivered its ruling, rejecting the notice of preliminary objection filed by the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), in response to MTN’s lawsuit.
The ruling, which was presided over by Honourable Justice Aneke has now been scheduled to be heard on June 26.
MTN took legal action after receiving a demand notice from the AGF alleging unpaid duties and taxes between 2007 and 2017. The telecommunications provider suit challenges the authority of the AGF to deal with issues around tax and custom duties.
According to the law, oversight for this is the responsibility of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS) and Nigerian Customs Service (NCS).
The court heard arguments on the AGF’s preliminary objection on March 26, 2019. At the time, the AGF requested that MTN’s suit be dismissed because it was not filed within the appropriate timeframe, which the AGF asserted was within three months of receipt of the initial request for a self-assessment. Having considered the matter, the judge determined that MTN’s suit was not statute-barred, as the company was only required to file its case within three months of receipt of the actual demand notice, which it did.
It is important to note that even if the court ultimately rules that the AGF is within its rights to assess taxes and duties, it does not imply that the assessment that has been made is legitimate.
MTN maintains that it is fully compliant with Nigerian tax laws. The company remains committed to meeting its fiscal responsibilities, and to contributing to the social and economic development of Nigeria.
Since incorporation in 2001, MTN has invested more than N2 trillion into the Nigerian economy and has paid more than N 1.7 trillion in taxes, levies and other regulatory fees.